The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-4339•Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted August 31, 2005 Decided October 6, 2005 Before… v. Keith A. Stevens
04-4339Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitOct 6, 2005
# UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted August 31, 2005*
Decided October 6, 2005
Before
Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 04-4339
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the Western District
of Wisconsin
v.
KEITH A. STEVENS,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-CR-111-C
Barbara B. Crabb,
Chief Judge.
## ORDER
Keith Stevens pleaded guilty to Count 6 of a nine-count superceding
indictment, which charged him with distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1). Relying on a career-offender recommendation and other guidelines-
based findings, the district court sentenced Stevens as a career offender to 151
months' imprisonment, the low-end of the applicable guideline range. Stevens now
argues under United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), that the district court
improperly treated the sentencing guidelines as mandatory and that this court
should remand the case for resentencing. See United States v. Schlifer, 403 F.3d
After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that
oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the
record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
<!-- PageBreak -->
No. 04-4339
849, 854 (7th Cir. 2005). The government concedes that Stevens preserved his
Booker objection and that the case should be remanded for resentencing.
Accordingly, we VACATE Stevens's sentence and REMAND for full resentencing in
light of Booker. See United States v. Goldberg, 406 F.3d 891, 894-95 (7th Cir.
2005).
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.