The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1960•United States of America v. Roman Skoczen
03-1960Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitSep 23, 2005
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
September 23, 2005
Before
Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 03-1960
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ROMAN SKOCZEN
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 95 CR 243
Charles P. Kocoras, Chief Judge.
O R D E R
After concluding that the district court correctly calculated the range under the Sentencing
Guidelines, this court ordered a limited remand so that the district court could inform us whether he
considers the sentence he imposed to be appropriate, given that the guidelines are no longer
mandatory. See United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 735 (2005); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d
471 (7th Cir. 2005).
The district court has informed us that he would impose the same sentence under the
advisory Guidelines. Sentence ranges properly calculated under the Guidelines are presumptively
reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir.2005), and the defendant has not
filed a response and therefore has not rebutted that presumption. Nor does our independent review
suggest that the sentence is unreasonable.
The judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.