The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-4276•Promatek Industries, Limited. v. Equitrac Corporation
00-4276Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitOct 18, 2002
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
October 18, 2002
Before
Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 00-4276
Promatek Industries, Limited.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Equitrac Corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 00 C 4999
Milton I. Shadur,
Judge.
O R D E R
The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled cause on August 13, 2002 is hereby amended
as follows:
On page 9, the second-to-last sentence of the first paragraph (beginning “It is Equitrac’s
use of the term...”) should be removed and replaced with the following: “The problem here is not
that Equitrac, which repairs Promatek products, used Promatek’s trademark in its metatag, but
that it used that trademark in a way calculated to deceive consumers into thinking that Equitrac
was Promatek. Id.”
Immediately following the sentence to be inserted above, the following footnote should be
inserted: “It is not the case that trademarks can never appear in metatags, but that they may only
do so where a legitimate use of the trademark is being made.”
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.