The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2257•Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued February 17, 2000 Decided February 2, 2001 Before… v. Kroger Company
99-2257Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitFeb 2, 2001
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Argued February 17, 2000
Decided February 2, 2001
Before
Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge
Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, Appeal from the United States
SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, District Court for the
and HOWARD MCDOUGALL, Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division.
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
No. 93 C 3669
John F. Grady, Judge.
v.
KROGER COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text
of the original opinion. See Central States, Area Pension Fund
v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2000). On page 910 of the
published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to
read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court's discussion
-- 1 of 2 --
Nos. 99-2257, 99-3014 Page 2
makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and
this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the
result in the case.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.