Layla Daryiosh v. Target Corporation

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0369n.06
No. 13-2146
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LAYLA DARYIOSH, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. In this diversity action, Appellant Layla
Daryiosh alleges that she suffered multiple injuries when she slipped and fell on a puddle in
Target’s store in Warren, Michigan. The district court granted Target’s motion for summary
judgment due to insufficient evidence of notice to support Daryiosh’s claim of negligence. After
carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we are convinced that
the district court did not err in its conclusions. The district court’s opinion carefully and
correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised and clearly articulates the reasons
underlying its decision. Thus, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no
useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.

-- 1 of 1 --