United States of America v. Christopher J. Mateen

12-4481Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitApr 9, 2014

Full text

<!-- PageHeader="No. 12-4481" -->

# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

CHRISTOPHER J. MATEEN,

Defendant-Appellee.

FILED
Apr 09, 2014
) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
)
\>
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

)
)

)
)

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS,
ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE,
STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing
of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous
opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case
on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is
vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

ich A Shut

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.