The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-4525•Philip J. Charvat v. Echostar Satellite, LLC
09-4525Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitOct 17, 2013
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 13a0898n.06
No. 09-4525
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
PHILIP J. CHARVAT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Before: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges, and BERTELSMAN, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM: On December 30, 2010, we issued an opinion in this case, invoking the
doctrine of primary jurisdiction and referring the matter to the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) to allow the agency to interpret certain provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act,
47 U.S.C. § 227, and its accompanying regulations. Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLC, 630 F.3d
459, 468 (6th Cir. 2010). On May 9, 2013, the FCC issued a declaratory ruling interpreting the
Telephone Act. In re Dish Network, LLC, 28 FCC Rcd. 6574 (2013). Accordingly, we now vacate
the judgment of the district court and remand this case for consideration of Charvat’s claims in light
of the FCC’s ruling.
* The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.