Randy Miller v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

09-4308Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitOct 27, 2010

Full text

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 10a0660n.06
No. 09-4308
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
RANDY MILLER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Before: MERRITT, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee Randy Miller appeals the
decision of the district court to grant the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant-Appellee
Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) and deny Miller’s motion for summary judgment. This
dispute involves an insurance policy issued by Allstate to Miller and that policy’s scope with respect
to damage caused by a fire and the City of Cleveland’s subsequent demolition of certain buildings
on the property. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs, and
having had the benefit of oral argument, we find that the district court’s opinion diligently and
correctly sets out the undisputed facts and the governing law. Because this court’s issuance of a full
opinion would be duplicative and would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm on the basis of
the district court’s well-reasoned order of July 20, 2009, granting Allstate’s motion for summary
judgment.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.