The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-4308•Randy Miller v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
09-4308Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitOct 27, 2010
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 10a0660n.06
No. 09-4308
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
RANDY MILLER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and
ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Before: MERRITT, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellee Randy Miller appeals the
decision of the district court to grant the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant-Appellee
Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) and deny Miller’s motion for summary judgment. This
dispute involves an insurance policy issued by Allstate to Miller and that policy’s scope with respect
to damage caused by a fire and the City of Cleveland’s subsequent demolition of certain buildings
on the property. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs, and
having had the benefit of oral argument, we find that the district court’s opinion diligently and
correctly sets out the undisputed facts and the governing law. Because this court’s issuance of a full
opinion would be duplicative and would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm on the basis of
the district court’s well-reasoned order of July 20, 2009, granting Allstate’s motion for summary
judgment.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.