The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-4503•Michael Tyrone Todd v. Commissioner of Social Security
08-4503Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitDec 17, 2009
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 09a0799n.06
No. 08-4503
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL TYRONE TODD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
C O U R T F O R T H E
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO
M E M O R A N D U M
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: NORRIS, CLAY, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Michael Todd, appeals from an order of the district court denying
his application for attorney fees following an order by the district court reversing the denial of
benefits. The district court concluded that fees were not warranted because the government’s
position was substantially justified. 28 U.S.C § 2412(d).
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on
appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court
erred in denying plaintiff’s application for attorney fees.
Because the reasoning which supports denial of attorney fees has been articulated by the
district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve
no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED upon the
reasoning used by that court in its order entered September 2, 2008.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.