The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-4611•Joseph W. Cole, Ii v. the Southern District of Ohio American Community Services, Inc.
06-4611United States Court Of Appeals For The 6th CircuitSep 25, 2007
*The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 07a0692n.06
Filed: September 25, 2007
NO. 06-4611
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH W. COLE, II, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
v. ) THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
) OHIO
AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES, )
INC., et al., )
)
Defendants-Appellees. )
Before: CLAY and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, Chief District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the district court granting summary
judgment in favor of Defendant American Community Services, Inc. Having reviewed the record
and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine
that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and AFFIRM the district court’s
decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. The district court’s decision to disregard
Plaintiff Cole’s affidavit was proper under the reasoning announced by this Court in Aerel, S.R.I. v.
PCC Airfols, LLC, 448 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the district court correctly found that
the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs did not support their state law tort
-- 1 of 2 --
2
claims and that Defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.