The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-1016•Gary Wirt v. the Eastern District of Michigan Ticona Polymers, Inc.
07-1016United States Court Of Appeals For The 6th CircuitSep 24, 2007
*The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 07a0689n.06
Filed: September 24, 2007
NO. 07-1016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
GARY WIRT, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
v. ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
) MICHIGAN
TICONA POLYMERS, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants-Appellees. )
Before: CLAYand GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, Chief District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Gary Wirt and Quantum Technologies, Inc., appeal the decision
of the district court dismissing their breach of contract claims against Defendant Ticona Polymers,
Inc., and its predecessor-in-interest, Celanese Corporation. Having reviewed the record and the
applicable law and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no
jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and AFFIRM the district court’s
decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.