The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-5669•Monroe L. Coleman-Bey v. Dan Dove
05-5669United States Court Of Appeals For The 6th CircuitAug 1, 2006
*The Honorable Curtis L. Collier, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by
designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 06a0543n.06
Filed: August 1, 2006
No. 05-5669
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
MONROE L. COLEMAN-BEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAN DOVE, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: DAUGHTERY and COOK, Circuit Judges; COLLIER, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal
of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the
record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s brief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose
would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court
upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.