Lillie M. Fetters v. Commissioner of Social Security

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a1000n.06
Filed: December 21, 2005
No. 05-5145
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LILLIE M. FETTERS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
BEFORE: MOORE, ROGERS, and MCKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Lillie M. Fetters appeals the district court’s decision
affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Fetters’s application for Disability
Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that
no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s
decision for the reasons stated in Judge Wilhoit’s October, 2004, order. In addition, Fetters’s
argument that the Commissioner should have used the Medical-Vocational Guidelines (Grids) to
find her disabled is without merit. Use of the Grids is not required at step four of the five-step
sequential process prescribed by 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 for evaluating disabilities. See Smith v. Sec.
of Health & Human Servs., 893 F.2d 106, 110 (6th Cir. 1989) (stating that the Grids were

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 05-5145
Fetters v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.
- 2 -
inapplicable to the claimant’s case because the ALJ had found that the claimant could perform her
past relevant work and thus was not disabled). The district court properly granted summary
judgment for the Commissioner. Its judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --