Jennifer Zimmer-Steinhebel v. COMCAST ADVERTISING SALES, INC., a f o r e i g n c o r p o r a t i o n

04-1790United States Court Of Appeals For The 6th CircuitAug 2, 2005

Full text

*The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of
Kentucky, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0653n.06
Filed: August 2, 2005
No. 04-1790
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JENNIFER ZIMMER-STEINHEBEL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMCAST ADVERTISING SALES, INC., a
f o r e i g n c o r p o r a t i o n ; C O M C A S T
CORPORATION, a foreign corporation;
BRENT GRAVES, an individual; CORKY
DAVIS, an individual; and MARILYN
SCLAFANI, an individual.
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Before: DAUGHTREY and COOK, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Jennifer Zimmer-Steinhebel appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment for Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Brent Graves, Corky
Davis, and Marilyn Sclafani. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law,
this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms
the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.