The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-5597•05a0352n.06
* The Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, United States District Judge for the District of
New Jersey, sitting by designation.
1
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0352n.06
Filed: May 4, 2005
No. 04-5597
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
__________________________________________
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE
) UNITED STATES DISTRICT
–vs.– ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN
) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
SAMMIE L. ALLEN, )
) O P I N I O N
Defendant-Appellant. )
__________________________________________)
BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; and ACKERMAN, District
Judge.*
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge. On December 18, 2003, Defendant
Sammie L. Allen entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of willfully failing to file a
federal income tax return for the year 2000, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. The plea was
conditioned upon this Court affirming the District Court’s adjudication of five pre-plea motions.
These motions are as follows: (1) Pre-Plea Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Abuse of the Grand
Jury and Prosecutorial Misconduct; (2) Motion to Dismiss and Notice of Misprision of Felony by
Sammie Allen; (3) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdictional Statement and Challenges [sic]
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Sammie Allen; (4) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
over the Alleged Accused; and (5) Motion to Quash Indictment and Motion to Dismiss for Want
of Personal Jurisdiction.
After carefully considering the record on appeal, we find no merit in the Defendant’s
legal arguments. Indeed, the frivolous nature of the Defendant’s motions, we think, betrays the
conduct to which he ultimately pled guilty. The legality of the federal income tax is beyond all
doubt, a proposition that can be made no plainer by repetitions or explanations. See Brushaber
v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916). Accordingly, the District Court’s adjudication of
each of the Defendant’s motions is hereby AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.