The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-5319•F. Chris Cawood v. LINDA BOOTH; JON FRENCH; RANDY SCARBROUGH; and DENNIS WORLEY
04-5319Court of Appeals for the Sixth CircuitApr 6, 2005
*The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Court Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by
designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0262n.06
Filed: April 6, 2005
No. 04-5319
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
F. CHRIS CAWOOD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LINDA BOOTH; JON FRENCH; RANDY
SCARBROUGH; and DENNIS WORLEY,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
M E M O R A N D U M
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and Mills, District Judge. *
PER CURIAM. F. Chris Cawood appeals the district court’s decision to grant summary
judgment to defendants, in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable
law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.
Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendants has been articulated by the
district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve
no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning
employed by that court in its opinion, Cawood v. Haggard, 327 F. Supp.2d 863 (E.D. Tenn, 2004).
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 04-5319
Caewood v. Haggard
- 2 -
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.