M E T O D I J A D I M O V S K I , V A L E N T I N ADIMOVSKA, and STEFAN DIMOVSKI v. Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security

*The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Court Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by
designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0253n.06
Filed: April 4, 2005
No. 04-1638
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
M E T O D I J A D I M O V S K I , V A L E N T I N A
DIMOVSKA, and STEFAN DIMOVSKI,
Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
TOM RIDGE, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND
SECURITY and JOHN A. MATA, FIELD
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MIAMI, FLORIDA,
Respondents-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
M E M O R A N D U M
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and MILLS, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Petitioners appeal from an Order of the district court dismissing their
petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dissolving a temporary stay of removal.
Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties and the applicable
law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing the petition and dissolving the
stay of removal.
Because the reasoning which supports the Order has been articulated by the district court, the
issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful
purpose. Accordingly, the Order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-1638
Dimovski v. Sec. Homeland Security
- 2 -
that court in its Opinion and Order, dated April 13, 2004. We note that the district court’s reasoning
is buttressed by an opinion issued by the Supreme Court after the district court’s opinion was filed,
Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711 (2004).

-- 2 of 2 --