TEKONSHA ENGINEERING CO., INC., a Michigan corporation v. C.W. INDUSTRIES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation

*The Honorable James D. Todd, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Tennessee,
sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0110n.06
Filed: February 14, 2005
No. 04-1200
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
TEKONSHA ENGINEERING CO., INC., a Michigan
corporation, and THEODORE BARGMAN CO., a
Michigan corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
C.W. INDUSTRIES, INC., a Pennsylvania
corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
M E M O R A N D U M
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: NORRIS, GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and TODD, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. In this breach of contract case, founded upon diversity of citizenship
jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, plaintiffs, Tekonsha Engineering Co., Inc., and Theodore Bargman
Co., appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant, C.W. Industries, Inc.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on
appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court
erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.
Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendant has been articulated by the
district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-1200
Tekonsha v. C.W. Industries, Inc.
- 2 -
no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning
employed by that court in its well-reasoned opinion dated January 26, 2004.

-- 2 of 2 --