Meadows v. Yusuff

99-60327Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 23, 2000

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60327
Conference Calendar
JERRELL LAMAR MEADOWS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KHURSHID YUSUFF,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:99-CV-87-BrS
--------------------
August 22, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jerrell Lamar Meadows, federal prisoner #86453-071, appeals
from the dismissal of his application for 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas
corpus relief, which the district court construed as a motion for
relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. A § 2255 motion is not inadequate or ineffective,
allowing a prisoner to pursue relief under § 2241, because the
§ 2255 motion would fail to satisfy the requirements for
obtaining authorization to file a successive motion. Tolliver v.
Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th Cir. 2000). The only court with

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 99-60327
-2-
jurisdiction over Meadows’s § 2255 motion was the District Court
in South Carolina. The district court did not err by dismissing
Meadows’s motion for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.