United States v. Ferdin

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 99-50521
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROLAND FERDIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. SA-93-CR-185-5-HG
- - - - - - - - - -
June 14, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Roland Ferdin appeals the 24-month sentence imposed by the
district court upon revocation of his supervised release. Ferdin
argues that his sentence violates due process because it was
based on “unsubstantiated and unverified factual information.”
Because this contention is raised for the first time on appeal,
it is reviewed only for plain error. See United States v. Olano,
507 U.S. 725, 730-37 (1993); United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d
160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). We have reviewed the
briefs and the record, and we perceive no plain error.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 99-50521
2–
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --