The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-50021•Howerton-Willis v. West Telemarketing
99-50021Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 10, 2000
*District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by
designation.
**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50021
DEBORAH HOWERTON-WILLIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION OUTBOUND,
Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas
(SA-97-CV-1164)
March 8, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM and PARKER, Circuit Judges and WARD,* District
Judge:
PER CURIAM:**
Plaintiff-Appellant, Deborah Howerton-Willis appeals the
summary judgment for Defendant-Appellee, West Telemarketing
Corporation Outbound on her claims brought pursuant to the
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101-12213 (1995) as
well as pendant state claims for intentional infliction of
emotional distress.
Having reviewed the record and the arguments and authorities
submitted by the parties, we conclude that summary judgment for
defendants should be affirmed for essentially the reasons set out
in the district court’s Order, dated December 8, 1998.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.