Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40830
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE WADE HALE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:97-CR-42-3
--------------------
August 24, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The court-appointed counsel for Jesse Wade Hale has moved
for leave to withdraw and filed a motion and brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hale has not filed a
response to the instant motion. Our independent review of the
motion, brief, and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
