The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-31183•Nasim v. Fuselier, et al
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-31183
Conference Calendar
GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CHARLES A. FUSELIER, Individually and in his official capacity;
TODD LOUVIERE, Warden, Individually and in his official capacity;
MAJORIE ALLEMOND, Individually and in her official capacity;
SAMONE ALEX, Individually and in her official capacity; KEW
LEDET, Individually and in his official capacity; R. JENKINS,
Individually and in his official capacity; DONNA BROUSSARD,
Individually and in her official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CV-579
--------------------
June 14, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detainee Ghulam
Mohammed Nasim (# 57187) moves this court for appointment of
appellate counsel. The motion is DENIED. Nasim appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as time-
barred, but he implicitly concedes that his complaint was not
filed within the applicable one-year limitation period. See
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 99-31183
-2-
Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 243-48 (1989); Elzy v. Roberson,
868 F.2d 793, 794-95 (5th Cir. 1989); LA. CIV. CODE ANN. art. 3492
(West 2000). We find no merit to Nasim’s argument that his
claims should be deemed to relate back to a prior lawsuit.
Accordingly, the dismissal of the complaint is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR COUNSEL DENIED. MOTION TO STAY FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT IS MOOT IN LIGHT OF THE OPINION.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.