The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-30647•George v. Livingston Parish Bd, et al
99-30647Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 11, 2000
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-30647
_____________________
LARONDA GEORGE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD;
RICK WENTZEL; LOUIS SCHULTZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Middle District of Louisiana
(U.S.D.C. No. 98-CV-466-B)
_______________________________________________________
September 8, 2000
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Laronda George appeals from the qualified-immunity dismissal of her claims
against appellees Rick Wentzel and Louis Schultz. We affirm because no
-- 1 of 2 --
2
constitutional violation of George’ rights under clearly established law was alleged.
See Guidry v. Broussard, 897 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1990) (holding that the law was
uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious
speech in a valedictory address). Appellees were therefore entitled to qualified
immunity.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.