United States v. Perez-Roman

99-21056Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 19, 2000

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-21056
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERTO PEREZ-ROMAN, also known as
Alberto Roman Perez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-399-1
--------------------
June 15, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto
Perez-Roman has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perez-
Roman has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 99-21056
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.