The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-20808•Youngblood v. Prudential Ins Co, et al
99-20808Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitSep 14, 2000
*Harlington Wood, Jr., Circuit Judge of the Seventh Circuit,
sitting by designation.
**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 99-20556
con. w/ No. 99-20808
KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and on behalf
of Youngblood & Associates PLLC, formerly known
as Youngblood & White PLLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; MARY J. MILLER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(H-98-CV-1794)
September 13, 2000
Before WOOD*, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:**
-- 1 of 2 --
2
After reviewing the record, considering the briefs of the
parties and argument of counsel and, with the single exception
described below, we are persuaded that the district court committed
no error.
The parties agree that the record reflects that the costs
incurred by appellees were $27,645.77 instead of $30,000. The
judgment of the district court is MODIFIED to award appellee the
sum of $27,645.77 in costs instead of $30,000 awarded by the
district court. The judgment of the district court is in all other
respects affirmed.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.