Biggs v. The City of Baytown

99-20392Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJul 7, 2000

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 99-20392
KIMBERLY DAGLE BIGGS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; ET AL.,
Defendants,
THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; MARVIN CURRIE, Officer,
Defendants-Appellees,
CHARLES SHAFFER, Chief of Police,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(H-96-CV-1203)
June 28, 2000
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After reviewing the record and based on the briefs and
arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court

-- 1 of 2 --

2
correctly concluded that material issues of fact were presented on
Chief Shaffer’s qualified immunity defense to Biggs’ sex
discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.