United States v. Rodriguez

99-20360Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 18, 2000

Full text

No.
-1-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20360
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELOISA RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-98-CR-414-3
- - - - - - - - - -
February 17, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eloisa Rodriguez appeals her sentence following her
conviction on one count of possession of cocaine with the intent
to distribute. She argues that the district court clearly erred
by denying her a two-level downward adjustment in her offense
level based upon her minor role in the offense. We have reviewed
the record and the briefs of the parties, and we conclude that
the district court did not clearly err by denying Rodriguez the
sought after adjustment. See United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d
1254, 1261 (5th Cir. 1994). Her sentence is AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.