The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-11249•Cox, et al v. City Wichita Falls, et al
99-11249Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 10, 2001
1Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
___________________________
No. 99-11249
___________________________
CHESTER COX, JR.; D. CLARK; PAULINE CLARK;
STEVE MURPHY; ROBYN MURPHY; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, a Texas Incorporated
Municipality; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; WILLIAM PERRY,
in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense;
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; F. WHITTEN PETERS,
in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department
of the Air Force; SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE;
MICHAEL ZETTLER, General, in his Official Capacity
as Base Commander of Sheppard Air Force Base,
Defendants - Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(7:96-CV-145)
_____________________________________________________________________
April 9, 2001
Before GARWOOD, HALL,1 and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
2Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
PER CURIAM:2
AFFIRMED. See 5TH Cir. R. 47.6.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.