The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-11236•Phillips, et al v. Forbes Inc
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 99-11236
GENE E. PHILLIPS,
and
CARMEL REALTY SERVICES, LTD.,
Plaintiffs/Appellants,
VERSUS
FORBES, INC.,
Defendant/Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
(3:98-CV-1893)
July 17, 2000
Before DAVIS, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the
parties, we are persuaded that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying appellants’ motion for reconsideration under
Rules 59 and 60 F.R.C.P. Essentially, for the reasons assigned by
-- 1 of 2 --
2
the district court in its October 3, 1999 Order, the judgment of
the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.