The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
98-41170•No. B-96-CV-71 MARCELINA ESPINOZA, Individually v. JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, In his Individual Capacity
98-41170Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 9, 2000
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41170
No. B-96-CV-71
MARCELINA ESPINOZA, Individually and on behalf of Estate of
ADRIAN ESPINOZA; JOSE E. ESPINOZA,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, In his Individual Capacity,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
February 4, 2000
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We have carefully considered this interlocutory appeal in
light of the briefs, oral argument, the district court opinion and
pertinent portions of the record. Like the district court, we
conclude that material questions of fact precluded the grant of
summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. For this reason,
the appeal is DISMISSED.
DISMISSED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.