Liesmann v. Owens, et al

*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-50103
Summary Calendar
_____________________
ELMO HAROLD LIESMANN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BOB OWENS, Director; TAMMY McINOCH,
Parole Officer, Dallas County,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-95-CV-396
_________________________________________________________________
July 9, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Elmo Harold Liesmann, Texas prisoner #390085, appeals the
dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
Liesmann contends that the requirements of Heck v. Humphrey, 114
S.Ct. 2364 (1994), do not apply to his claims against the
defendants. We do not agree. See Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175,

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
177 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 148 (1995). We have
reviewed the record and Liesmann’s brief and AFFIRM the district
court’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons adopted by the
district court. Liesmann v. Owens, No. A-95-CV-396 (W.D. Tex.
Jan. 2, 1996).
A F F I R M E D.

-- 2 of 2 --