The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
96-40104•United States v. Hinojosa
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40104
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERT HINOJOSA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the
Southern District of Texas
(C-95-CR-120-1)
February 24, 1997
Before JOHNSON, EMILIO GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Albert T. Honojosa has appealed his conviction for possessing
a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). There is no merit
ot his contentions that the district court deprived him effective
assistance of counsel or of a fair trial. See Lockhart v.
Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364, 372 (1993); United States v. Bermea, 30
F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113,
1825 (1995).
AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.