Full text
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-40059
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO ORDONEZ-MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CA-L-75-51
- - - - - - - - - -
June 11, 1997
Before KING, JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Francisco Ordonez-Mendoza has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and
the record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
