The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
96-20768•United States v. Jones
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20768
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 96-CR-25-1
- - - - - - - - - -
May 26, 1997
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Thomas Jones appeals from his sentence following his guilty-
plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine
base. He argues that the district court erred by increasing his
offense level by two pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 for obstruction
of justice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Based upon the testimony at the sentencing hearing, the
district court did not err by increasing Jones’ offense level for
obstruction of justice. See United States v. Cabral-Castillo, 35
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 96-20768
- 2 -
F.3d 182, 186 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.