Full text
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 94-10214
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDDIE A. NUNNELLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:93-CR-314-D
- - - - - - - - - -
(September 21, 1994)
Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Eddie Nunnelley has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.
Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and we have independently
reviewed counsel's brief, the points raised by Nunnelley, and the
record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
-- 1 of 1 --
