The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
92-2769•(caption unavailable)
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions
that have no precedential value and merely decide particular
cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes
needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal
profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 92-2658 c/w 92-2769
Conference Calendar
__________________
O.D. VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
STATE OF TEXAS,
ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CA-H-89-3469
- - - - - - - - - -
August 18, 1993
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
O.D. Van Duren's brief for his appeal of the district
court's denial of various post-judgment motions is so devoid of
substance that it presents no error for the Court to review. See
Brinkmann v. Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Fed. R.
App. P. 28(a)(5).
The appeal is DISMISSED because it is without arguable merit
and thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th
Cir. 1983).
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.