United States v. Brown

19-10511United States Court Of Appeals For The 5th CircuitFeb 11, 2020

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10511
Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTHONY ROY BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:18-CR-310-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Roy Brown has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Brown has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Brown’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5
TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 11, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 19-10511 Document: 00515306642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/11/2020

No. 19-10511
2
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5
TH CIR. R. 42.2. Brown’s request for substitute
counsel or to proceed pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d
901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case: 19-10511 Document: 00515306642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/11/2020

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.