United States v. Bucio-Cisneros

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10308
Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN BUCIO-CISNEROS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:17-CR-574-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*
The attorney appointed to represent Martin Bucio-Cisneros has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Bucio-Cisneros has filed a response. The record is not
sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bucio-Cisneros’s
claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5
TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 16, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 19-10308 Document: 00515492903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/16/2020

No. 19-10308
2
claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,
739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Bucio-Cisneros’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5
TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case: 19-10308 Document: 00515492903 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/16/2020