Hayward Slater, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director

17-11348United States Court Of Appeals For The 5th CircuitJun 19, 2020

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-11348
Summary Calendar

HAYWARD GEORGE SLATER, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CV-979

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*

Hayward George Slater, Jr., Texas prisoner # 1734721, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his conviction for capital
murder and sentence of life imprisonment. We granted Slater’s motion for a
certificate of appealability (COA) with respect to “the district court’s
procedural decision not to consider Slater’s grounds five, six, eight, and nine,”

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5
TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 19, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 17-11348 Document: 00515459619 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2020

No. 17-11348
2
denied a COA as to all other issues, and remanded to the district court for
findings of fact.
We now affirm. In his initial brief, Slater fails to demonstrate that the
district court clearly erred in finding that the clerk’s office had not mishandled
his filings, see St. Aubin v. Quarterman, 470 F.3d 1096, 1101 (5th Cir. 2006),
and he does not otherwise address the procedural issue as to which a COA was
granted, see Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1983). We do not
consider the arguments raised for the first time in Slater’s reply brief. See
United States v. Davis, 602 F.3d 643, 648 n.7 (5th Cir. 2010). His motion for
appointment of counsel is denied. See Wardlaw v. Cain, 541 F.3d 275, 279 (5th
Cir. 2008).
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Case: 17-11348 Document: 00515459619 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2020

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.