The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-51360•United States v. Ginez-Rodriguez
05-51360Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 14, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 14, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-51360
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
LAURA PATRICIA GINEZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:05-CR-24-1
----------------------------------------------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counselappointed to represent Laura Patricia Ginez-Rodriguez on appeal has requested leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ginez-
Rodriguez, who pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the transportation of an illegal alien for
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
commercial advantage or financial gain, received a copy of counsel’s motion and has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no issue of arguable merit
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.