Bell v. Farmers Insurance, et al

05-10432Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 23, 2006

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 23, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-10432
Conference Calendar
JOHANNA BELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FARMERS INSURANCE; MID CENTURY INSURANCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:04-CV-2221-N
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Johanna Bell appeals the district court’s dismissal of her
civil suit without prejudice for want of service. Bell has
failed to brief, and has thus abandoned, the issue whether the
district court erred in determining that her suit should be
dismissed due to her failure to effect service on the defendants.
See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993);
Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,
748 (5th Cir. 1987); see also FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9).
Consequently, Bell’s appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 05-10432
-2-
Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.