The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-60040•Bailey, et al v. Hymel, et al
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
**See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 12, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-60040
Summary Calendar
H.W. BAILEY; J. DENNIS DAVID,
Petitioners
versus
HUBERT HYMEL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
--------------------
Petition for Review of the Decision and Order of the Benefits
Review Board
BRB No. 03-0643
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, EMILO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The petition for review is denied for the reasons given by the
Benefits Review Board.**
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.