Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-41341
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT S. SAENZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:03-CR-80-1
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Robert S. Saenz on appeal has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Saenz has filed
a pro se response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief,
Saenz’s pro se response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
