The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-41109•Davis v. County of Refugio
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 1, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-41109
Summary Calendar
DONNA DAVIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
COUNTY OF REFUGIO,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:02-CV-102
--------------------
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donna Davis (hereinafter “Davis”), a Hispanic female, sued
her employer, the County of Refugio (hereinafter “the County”) in
federal district court alleging that the County discriminated
against her on the grounds of race when it decided to terminate
her employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964. The County filed an answer alleging that Davis was
terminated for cause, i.e., insubordination and unsatisfactory
performance; and after adequate time for discovery, the County
filed a motion for summary judgement. The district court found
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 04-41109
-2-
that Davis had failed to present any evidence that the County’s
legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for termination of her
employment was not believable; and the court further ruled that
Davis did not set forth any evidence that race was a motivating
factor in the decision to terminate her employment. The district
court granted the County’s motion for summary judgment and
entered a final judgment accordingly. Davis appeals.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts
and relevant portions of the record. For the reasons stated by
the district court in its Memorandum and Order filed under date
of July 14, 2004, we affirm the final judgment dismissing Davis’
claims with prejudice entered on July 14, 2004.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.