The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-40164•United States v. Heinaman
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-40164
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHAWN QUINTIN HEINAMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-01-CR-360-3
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Shawn Quintin Heinaman has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Heinaman was
informed of counsel’s motion but has not responded to it. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.