Nguyen v. Young

04-31183Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 20, 2005

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 20, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-31183
Conference Calendar
HAI VAN NGUYEN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH P. YOUNG,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CV-1458
--------------------
Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Hai Van Nguyen (Nguyen), federal prisoner # 18720-018,
appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Nguyen was sentenced to 165 months in
prison based on convictions for racketeering, conspiring to
engage in racketeering, conspiring to interfere with commerce by
robbery, and interfering with commerce by robbery. Nguyen
attempted to challenge the method by which the Bureau of Prisons
(BOP) calculates good time credits, but the district court

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-31183
-2-
dismissed the petition because Nguyen had failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies before filing his petition in federal
court.
Because Nguyen is a federal prisoner proceeding under 28
U.S.C. § 2241, he is not required to obtain a certificate of
appealability. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th
Cir. 2001). Nguyen concedes that he did not exhaust the three-
level administrative remedy process. He asserts, however, that
his failure to exhaust should be excused because pursuing
administrative relief would be futile and because he would suffer
irreparable harm by following the administrative process. Nguyen
has not established that the district court abused its discretion
in dismissing his petition without prejudice. See Fuller v.
Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). The judgment is thus
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.