Roye v. Safety-Kleen Inc

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 30, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-20166
Summary Calendar
LARRY ROYE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SAFETY-KLEEN (DEER PARK), INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CV-2848
--------------------
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larry Roye appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to Safety-Kleen (Deer Park), Inc., (SK) in this
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) case. Roye argues that the
district court erred in determining that his Dumping Syndrome did
not leave him disabled under the ADA and that he was not
qualified to perform the job function of attendance. Roye also
argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-20166
-2-
to SK because SK improperly assessed the number of points that
were attributable to his absences.
Roye has failed to show that his DS substantially limited
one or more major life activities. See Toyota Motor Mfg., Inc.,
v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184, 197 (2002). Roye has likewise failed
to show that the district court erred in concluding that he could
not perform one of the major functions of his job. See Hypes v.
First Commerce Corp., 134 F.3d 721, 726 (5th Cir. 1998). Roye’s
contentions concerning the propriety vel non of SK’s assessment
of points for his absences do not effect the district court’s
analysis.
Roye has not shown that the district court erred in granting
SK’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --