The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-10605•United States v. Nowden
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-10605
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES CLEVELAND NOWDEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-34-ALL-Y
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In this expedited appeal, Charles Cleveland Nowden
challenges the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised
release. Nowden argues that the evidence was insufficient to
establish that he violated the terms of supervised release. He
challenges the credibility determinations made by the district
court.
This court will not disturb the district court’s credibility
determinations on appeal. See United States v. Alaniz-Alaniz,
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 04-10605
-2-
38 F.3d 788, 790 (5th Cir. 1994). The testimony offered by the
probation officer was sufficient to establish by a preponderance
of the evidence that Nowden violated the terms of supervised
release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v. McCormick,
54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.