Richardson v. Monitronics Intl Inc

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
September 9, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
Summary Calendar
No. 04-10225
_______________________
PAMELA RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas,
Dallas Division
3-02-CV-2238-N
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Richardson appeals the district court’s award
of summary judgment to Appellee Monitronics International, Inc.
The district court found that Richardson failed to raise a material
issue as to any entitlement or retaliatory violation of the Family
and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). This court reviews the grant of
summary judgment de novo, using the same standard as the district
court. Urbano v. Continental Airlines, Inc., 138 F.3d 204, 205
(5th Cir. 1998).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
After closely reviewing the record below, we find no
reversible error and agree with the district court’s well-reasoned
resolution of this matter.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --